Constitutional & Judicial Review Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Constitutional & Judicial Review - Essay ExampleAl is a US citizen and natesnot claim entry to another country as a matter of right, unless that country is uncoerced to grant entry to him. Under the circumstances, the floor writing table to UK is of the opinion that violent speeches and statements of Al against the ongoing state of war in Europe may create violent eruptions in UK society. His meeting in Washington DC has already resulted in unpleasant abandon and arrests, and this incident combined with his earlier writings and statements led the firm Secretary to presume that his presence in unify land might result in violence and clashes. Home Secretary is within his right to reject permission to enter UK1. Home Secretary necessitate not give explanations to entry denial actions. A judicial Review action against the United Kingdom Home Secretary might not be very successful, even though Als speeches in United States could not be termed as violence provoking. This charismat ic leader belongs to an anti-war pressure group and it is not an offensive activity to oppose a war. There is a lot of difference between an anti-war pressure group and a terrorism-provoking group. Anti Government sentiments are not exactly terrorist acts. Violence broke out because of pro-war protesters and it was a mere clash between the two groups that could happen anywhere. There was no bloodshed and the event did not catch out any anti government euphoria. Al can fight the decision by utter that condemning the war in Iraq is not exactly fomenting terrorism and he has a right to chat his opinion2. But his rights to go to the European valet Rights commission are limited as he is uncomplete a citizen of European Union, nor of one of its Member States. In the second flake, Shoab, a Muslim clerk from Libya was presumptuousness permission to stay in UK as postgraduate student till August 2003. He employ for indefinite leave to remain in United Kingdom. As Shoab is on studen t visa, it is difficult for him to go away indefinite leave to remain even under normal circumstances. Usually student visas are extendible only during the period of study and it is never indefinite and Shoabs visa did not get extended. Home Secretary informed him that on account of your connections with Islamic terrorists groups, your deportation from the United Kingdom would be conducive to the public good. Home Secretary believes that Shoab has connections with MAWI (Muslims against Western Imperialism), a group implicated in recent terrorist incidents in the West and had follow a policy of seeking to deport all foreign nationals with links to MAWI. Home Secretary is alike accused of gaining mileage and electoral support for government in the approaching election. At a interview of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), the deportation order was confirmed. Shoabs barrister was however prevented from cross-examining witnesses and from knowing full details of the c ase against him. As Shoab is living in United Kingdom as a student he can approach European Union Human Rights Court against his deportation. He can go to the court and to Human Right Activists.